Why are compete.com traffic stats so low?

Compete.com only tracks the United States traffic to websites. We have worked for many companies assisting them with determining the discrepancies between multiple tracking services. Most everyone uses the free services such as Alexa, Compete, Quantcast, and of course paid services such as Comscore. Typically these four services are compared to a websites statistics provided by a service such as Google Analytics.

When comparing actual site analytics to these free services you are bound to see discrepancies. By actual we mean tracking of every page as opposed to statistical sampling which then infers the amount of web traffic or pages viewed to a site.

I wanted to point out that Compete only provides web traffic data from users in the United States. Just knowing that will answer most of the initial questions regarding discrepancy in compete data with your own.

You should also know Compete’s methodology for determining web traffic to a particular website. While Google analytics provides code to put on every page of your website in an attempt to obtain actual data, Compete uses a panel of 2 million individuals. The panel is a cross section of Internet users in the United States and they obtain click stream data from ASP’s and ISPs. They also obtain data from widgets, applications, and their toolbar.

You can read more about the Compete panel and projections on their website. It is important to know the differences between the methodologies of each of the tracking companies. Not only do you need to know the methodologies but you also need to know the nomenclature as each one of them has different definitions. To properly compare one to the other it is important to know what each data point means and how it is defined. In other words how do they define a visitor, a visit, do they use cookies etc.


Google Trends vs. Compete, Alexa, Quantcast and Comscore?

Google Trends for Websites
Google Analytics is WOW, Google Ad Planner is amazing, Google Trends – hmmm, not so much. It is as if they started to create Google Trends for Websites, heard the phone ring – answered the phone – had a long conversation, and forgot they ever started it in the first place. haha.

Do not get me wrong, I am truly amazed at most all Google products, especially when it comes to Google Analytics which is incredibly powerful. However, I am not sure what the point of the current Google Trends for Websites is. After using Quantcast, Alexa and Compete, and the pay-for-play Comscore, this makes you say ‘huh?’ Here is the basic graph you receive:

google_trends_twitter

Placeholder for World Domination?
It could very well be that Google is merely waiting for the right moment to unleash their own public web analytics after a certain threshold of Google Analytics users haev been met. Quantcast has a twofold method for providing site analytics, the traditional polling method and code on pages if the site owner opts for it (what they call quantified). Google has the same capabilities.

Google Search Bar
They can utilize their install base of the Google Search bar to obtain site analytics across the web. Much like Alexa does.

Google Analytics
Much like Quantcast, many site users have the Quantcast code on their site. This provides an accurate measurement of traffic to that site as opposed to extrapolation based on a sample size.

Sleeping Dog
Right now there is no reason to use the Google Trends for Websites, however that sleeping dog may awake, utilize Google Analytics installs and Search Bar installs to crush all others. Wow, what would that do to Comscore who charges and arm and a leg for their data? Comscore is probably not too happy about the Google Media Planner – now that is quite impressive.


Alexa, Quantcast and Compete Do Not Matter

When I first began this site to monitor my online marketing progress I sat back to determine what metrics I should use to monitor progress. My first thoughts were about 50% right and 50% wrong. There are many statistics available for websites, however not all of them are relevant. Whether or not a statistic makes any sense for you depends on what your goal is.

As my site was new I thought it would be important to monitor site traffic, unique visitors, page views and other typical metrics. While these are valuable and can be used in many ways, such as encouraging advertisers to advertise, they alone are not metrics from which I can make decisions that will impact my main goal.

Determine Your Main Goal
Before you determine which metrics to utilize when monitoring your success and to make decisions from, you must first determine your goal. A site may offer a paid newsletter subscription, their goal would be to obtain new paid users. There are various steps in the process from a first time visitor through the final action of subscribing to a newsletter. In the case of this site the main goal is revenue. Simply tracking traffic to the site is not enough. Therefore should I really of cared about Alexa, Quantcast and Compete?

Alexa, Quantcast and Compete Do Not Matter
In the case of these tracking sites they track overall traffic but that is not the goal of this site. Having third party numbers showing that this site is visited more or less than another is not helpful. Alexa, Quantcast, and Compete have their uses. Alexa Rankings recently changed and Quantcast actually allows you to add code to your pages to add additional information to their statistics about your site. Why would you use them? Mainly to have a third party validate the web traffic to your site and Quantcast also provides information such as demographics about your site visitors. Useful for some purposes but not for this site.

Revenue Metrics
What matters in the case of this site is the ultimate goal of revenue and which metrics assist in determining how to optimize the revenue. If 100,000 people visit my site in one day and I do not generate revenue it does not matter if another 100,000 come the next day, so my Alexa ranking may be high but increasing my Alexa ranking through non converting traffic does me no good. Determining where my visitors come from, such as keywords in a search engine, what they do when they are here, and whether they ultimately end up increasing revenue for this site are the only metrics that matter.

Suggestion
I strongly suggest adding the Google Analytics code to your site. The information they gather is only accessible to you, a free statistics package from Google, and the information is invaluable. You cannot beat this free statistics package and you can better track the metrics that matter to your site.

Website Rankings from Alexa Compete and Quantcast

Determine your site traffic with the most popular free ranking sites: Alexa, Compete and Quantcast. Instead of using Comscore many opt for the freely available site traffic rankings sites, here is how they work.

There are 3 publicly available traffic sites: Alexa, Quantcast and Compete. Most in our industry not consider them statistically valid, and we do not rely on them for a variety of reasons including:

  • Alexa extrapolates rankings from their data. The data is collected based on those individuals that decide to download their tool in their browser (Firefox just recently added) and Alexa then determines rankings based on their behavior. Anyone can download their utility and they may not control the sample. You may see wild fluctuations month to month due to their methods. Visit Alexa Here.
  • Alexa is very similar to Alexa and individuals must install the Compete bar. Visit Compete Here.
  • Quantcast has some basic data, however you must implement their code on your site so they can collect information about your site and visitors. This may be the most accurate of the three, so the data may be the most relevant. Visit Quantcast Here.

Each one of these sites is worth looking at as third party verifiers of your site activity.